In a decision that has sparked debate in legal circles, Chief Judge Michael A. Chagares of the Third Circuit Court of Appeals has reportedly upheld a lower court order in the case of Louis Neptune v. Andrew Carey et al. The ruling, which has yet to be widely circulated, allegedly addresses the validity of arrests made under questionable circumstances and the extent of prosecutorial immunity.

According to sources close to the case, the dispute stems from an arrest of Louis Neptune, which the plaintiff claims was made without probable cause. The plaintiff alleges that the arrest was carried out despite a lack of evidence and was based on testimony that was later proven to be perjured.

Key points of contention in the case include:

1. The plaintiff's claim that the arrest was made without probable cause.
2. Allegations that the defendant could not provide evidence during the discovery phase of the legal proceedings.
3. Claims that a key witness for the prosecution was proven to have committed perjury.
4. Reports that Chief Judge Chagares upheld that prosecutors maintain immunity even when an arrest is made without probable cause contrary to the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution.

The ruling by Chief Judge Chagares reportedly upholds that an arrest can be deemed valid even in the absence of evidence and when based on potentially perjured testimony. Additionally, the decision appears to reinforce broad prosecutorial immunity, even in cases where arrests may lack probable cause. These aspects of the ruling, if accurately reported, could have significant implications for future cases involving disputed arrests and prosecutorial conduct.

Legal experts suggest that this ruling may effectively prevent the case from moving to trial or reaching a settlement, potentially denying the plaintiff the opportunity to seek monetary damages.

Adding another layer of complexity to the case, it has been noted that several judges involved in various stages of the proceedings share an educational background. Trial Judge Brian R. Martinotti, Appellate Judge Paul Matey, Chief Judge Michael A. Chagares, and current Judge Michael A. Shipp are all reported to be graduates of Seton Hall Law School. This common alma mater has raised questions about potential networks of influence within the judiciary.

Furthermore, it has been alleged that Appellate Judge Paul Matey has a personal connection to the defendant, Andrew Carey. This claim has intensified concerns about potential conflicts of interest in the judicial process.

As this story develops, legal scholars and civil rights advocates are closely watching for the wider implications this ruling may have on arrest standards, prosecutorial immunity, judicial impartiality, and the rights of individuals in the criminal justice system.

(Note: This press release is based on claims and allegations. The accuracy of these claims has not been independently verified by this news organization. We encourage readers to seek official court documents for the most accurate and up-to-date information.)​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

Please contact
Phil Murphy governor of New Jersey

THANK YOU.