As global cross-border transactions have increased, so have international disputes. International arbitration has become the preferred method of resolving disputes because organisations and individuals prefer a neutral international tribunal to foreign domestic courts. This article will show some light on arbitration resolution in Sweden and talk about its benefits.

When parties decide to arbitrate their dispute, they have the right to choose private arbitrators rather than choosing law courts. International arbitration is typically acknowledged as the preferred dispute resolution method for the majority of cross-border transactions since it establishes a neutral forum, awards are frequently simpler to enforce than court judgements, and parties can select the arbitrator(s) who will hear their case.

In essence, it entails the selection of an arbitrator, who is a third party appointed to resolve disputes between parties in accordance with a procedure agreed upon by the parties, outside the jurisdiction of domestic courts. Unlike domestic courts that apply a certain state's legislation, international arbitration offers a more impartial forum. On the other hand, arbitration tribunals are private organisations that are not constrained by local laws and are capable of handling disputes resulting from international business transactions.

International Arbitration in Sweden

In Sweden, there is a lengthy history of international arbitration. Sweden has historically been a sought-after location for commercial arbitration in Sweden because it is an arbitration-friendly jurisdiction, particularly for parties from the former Soviet Union and China when negotiating with their counterparts from the United States, Western Europe, and Canada. The grounds for this are historical and stem from the Cold War because the US and the Soviet Union accepted the Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce (the "SCC") as a neutral forum for settling international disputes as early as the 1970s.

One of the most prestigious international organisations for the resolution of business disputes is the Arbitration Institute of the SCC. The Arbitration Institute is a part of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce but is separate from it.

There are only a few mandatory provisions in the Swedish Arbitration Act from which the Parties cannot deviate. For instance, Section 1 stipulates that only conflicts in which parties can negotiate a settlement may be subject to arbitration. Another clause regarded as necessary by Swedish law is Section 8 of the Swedish Arbitration Act, which stipulates that arbitrators must be impartial and independent. The arbitral award must also be in writing, duly signed by the arbitrators, and adhere to the fundamental principles of Swedish public policy, as stated clearly in Section 33.

There are only a few mandatory provisions in the Swedish Arbitration Act from which the Parties cannot deviate. For instance, Section 1 specifies that only conflicts that can be settled by negotiation are eligible for arbitration. Another clause deemed crucial by Swedish law is Section 8 of the Swedish Arbitration Act, which demands that arbitrators be impartial and independent. Aside from that, the arbitral ruling must be in writing, contain the arbitrators' official signatures, and adhere to Section 33's explicit articulation of the fundamental principles of Swedish public policy.

commercial arbitration in sweden indicates Full party autonomy is guaranteed by international arbitration, meaning that the parties can agree among themselves on whether or not to send the dispute to arbitration. The parties must mutually agree to submit the matter to arbitration. Article 8 of the UNCITRAL Model Law stipulates that it shall only be utilised in situations where there is "an agreement by the parties to submit all or certain disputes to arbitration. Thus giving importance to mutual consent.

The UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration (the "Model Law") was a major source of inspiration for Swedish legislators, even though Sweden did not formally adopt it. Most of the provisions in Swedish law are very similar to those in the Model Law, and this is especially true after the 2019 amendments.

Despite not being officially adopted by Sweden, it served as a significant source of inspiration to make concrete laws. After the 2019 modifications, the majority of the provisions in Sweden can be comparable differently to other types of legislation.

See More:

Website: https://rattsakuten.com/

Blogs: https://rattsakuten.com/blog/

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rattsakuten1/

Twitter: https://twitter.com/rattsakuten

Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/authwall?trk=bf&trkInfo=bf&original_referer=&sessionRedirect=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fcompany%2Frattsakuten

Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCzSmOYOPM13699iOvXbIbmw