Immediate Press release Date, Place: Kolkata, 8.3.2025: In a recent systematic literature review and network-meta-analysis, researchers delved into comparing two widely used therapies for treating depression—Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) and Third-Wave Mindfulness-Based Therapies (MBTs). The study aimed to assess which approach is most effective in alleviating depressive symptoms, measured using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), a widely recognized scale for evaluating depression severity.

Dr Rupa Talukder is professional best psychological counselor in Kolkata. Cognitive Behavioral therapy is best for getting rid of mental stress, anxiety, depression and improving your mental and physical health issues.
She makes a proper awareness program for people who are spent with mental depression, anxiety etc.
The debate over the best treatment for depression is ongoing. While CBT has long been considered the gold standard, third-wave mindfulness-based therapies, such as Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT) and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), have gained significant traction in recent years. These therapies emphasize present-moment awareness, acceptance, and non-judgmental mindfulness, offering an alternative to traditional CBT’s more structured approach.

The systematic review included a comprehensive analysis of multiple studies that evaluated the efficacy of CBT and MBTs. Researchers focused on the Beck Depression Inventory scores to quantify the severity of depression in patients undergoing both therapies. By comparing various studies in a network-meta-analysis, the researchers could draw more reliable conclusions about which therapy provided better outcomes.
Key findings showed that while both CBT and MBTs are effective in treating depression, they each offer distinct advantages depending on the patient’s needs. CBT was found to be particularly beneficial for individuals who thrive in structured, goal-oriented treatments. On the other hand, MBTs were especially effective for patients struggling with self-criticism or who had difficulty engaging in more rigid therapeutic methods.

"This study provides valuable insight into how different therapeutic approaches can meet diverse patient needs," said Dr. Rupa Talukder, one of the lead researchers. "It suggests that a one-size-fits-all model is not ideal for treating depression, and a personalized approach may lead to better outcomes for patients."

The study also highlighted the importance of considering individual preferences and treatment history when choosing a therapeutic approach. Patients who have previously undergone CBT might benefit from incorporating mindfulness practices, while those new to therapy may find CBT’s structure more appealing.

Ultimately, the study underscores the importance of evidence-based treatments and encourages clinicians to consider both CBT and MBTs when developing individualized treatment plans for patients with depression. The findings are a step toward a more nuanced understanding of how different therapeutic methods can be combined or tailored to optimize patient care.

For more information on this groundbreaking research, or to schedule an interview with Dr. Rupa Talukder, please contact the research team at [Mind's Eye].
About [Mind’s Eye]
[Mind’s Eye] is a leading research institution dedicated to advancing the field of mental health through evidence-based approaches. Our work strives to provide innovative and personalized solutions to those affected by mental health disorders.