Kpss Yayinlari
In my pocket, I have an old cowhide wallet. It contains enough banknotes to purchase a shiny new wallet of a superior model I found in a magazine. This purchasing power has a place with recently me: I am the special case who can utilize those notes to purchase anything. In like manner, in the event that I exchange them to someone else, then rather than me, just this other individual will possess their purchasing power.

Yet regardless of the possibility that my exchanging endlessly my banknotes can simply exchange along their control, it could never exchange along their property, which is not just mine. The notes, as representations of cash, don't have a place with quite recently me. For instance, I have no privilege to make or wreck them: they are open. What fits in with just me or just to whoever else controls any such notes is somewhat their purchasing power, which henceforth must be private.

Undoubtedly, if my banknotes were just mine, then I could exchange them away by offering them, not as cash, but instead as simply solid articles. Be that as it may, this would keep me in any event briefly from utilizing those notes to purchase anything. So by perceiving the purchasing power they then would lose as their money related quality and their rather keeping this worth as its representation, we can close:

All fiscal quality must be private.

Its representation must be open, or unsellable.

Still, if not me, then who else can offer, purchase, make, or devastate those banknotes? This inquiry ought to be unimportant if what I possess is their money related esteem as opposed to the notes themselves. On the other hand, if offering, purchasing, making, or crushing them can change their individual money related worth, then the same inquiry gets to be basic.

Secretly Public Money

Recognizing the letter "a" from its verbal sound would keep this visual representation of that sound. In like manner, recognizing a banknote from its money related worth would keep this solid, target representation of that esteem.

The subsequent disarray (vagary) between a representation and what it speaks to should happen to all representations of something so as to something subject to them autonomous from them. Undoubtedly, the letter "a" does not rely on upon its outwardly spoke to verbal sound, or a banknote on its money related worth. In like manner, an electronic record does not rely on upon its parity, nor a valuable metal sum on its purchasing power. Anything both subject to its representation and spoke to by something autonomous from speaking to it gets to be unclear from that representation.

Also, just solid items can stay free from what they speak to. So letters (like "a"), banknotes, valuable metals, or electronic records, regardless of the possibility that just envisioned, are all solid articles. While on the other hand, all simply solid, target representations of cash must stay indistinct from their money related worth, regardless of any such esteem and its representation being dependably individually private and open.