Conflict about abortion will never meet to an end; it’s going on from so many decades. Both parties one adopted pro-life stand and another party adopted pro-choice stand, have put their arguments in support of why it is necessary and why it is unnecessary to declare an abortion as legal or illegal. Despite these arguments over socially sensitive topic for prolong time; it is still being said that let the mother decide whether to conceive a baby or get an abortion done. It feels good to know that the argument in support of pro-choice secured a small victory in Wisconsin, USA. A judge at the time of hearing of this case mentioned that abortion specialists available in Wisconsin shall be conferred an authority to admit a patient in the hospital that exists within close proximity; for example 30 to 50 miles from his or her private medical facility. Assessment of actual requirement and declaring it to be unconstitutional seems to be correct decision. Women must be sovereign to decide from whom and where they get their abortions done.
This law will enable doctors to perform an abortion anywhere, although he or she is 30 to 50 mile away from a hospital. It accords the woman right to select a doctor on whom she has trust to perform complete this procedure, because wrong decision and wrong treatment would drive her towards dangerous incident or sometime death. Threat to her life prevails if the tools are not utilized in appropriate manner or sterilized. This law asks the mother to choose how and where she wants to undergo an abortion. There are so many women who prefer private clinics as a substitute of hospitals simply because they do not have confidence about the doctor and other staff who will perform the procedure. Basically, there is a possibility of being judged from which place a pregnant woman chooses to under abortion procedure this thought creates great confusion and poor trust on the staff and doctors of the hospital, therefore maximum women prefer to get it done in the private clinic. So, it doesn’t matter for them whether a clinic is within the Wisconsin’s set limit or not.
This law will not tolerate any interference by the government officials or Wisconsin’s personnel in relation to the decision taken by the woman. There is compulsion of particular location in the context of abortion; it is solemnly her decision about how to get an abortion done and which place to visit for the purpose, whether it is a hospital or private clinic. The policies of chalked out by the clinic for example: planned parenthood, and those private practitioners who are not situated within the limit of 50 miles of a hospital will reduce staff and perhaps lead to shut down of private and small clinics. On the contrary now doctors shall not need to worry about obtaining hospital’s authority to carry an abortion on patient it would be considered as a private surgery. In conclusion, this verdict from her side doesn’t only guarantee complete autonomy to have sound control over the pregnancy but thwarts negative consequences of the untoward reality on her life.