I think one of the fears would be that a ton of players all of a sudden would no longer be used. Teams might not be as creative (although you could argue that they aren't now). For the upcoming FIFA 17 series, we will prepare the fifa 17 coins. On the flip side of that, a lot of players that aren't used very often now would start to be common place (stars in smaller leagues).

There a lot of pros and cons of going without chemistry, but I personally would like to try to go without it just for the sake of switching it up. If they were to do that, which I highly doubt they would, I am sure in a year or two a lot of people will be coming out saying they miss chemistry.

I personally just don't find it unreasonable at the very least for EA to be upfront about chemistry and the exact boosts it gives. I have always thought this, there literally is nothing I can think of that is a legitimate reason for why they aren't transparent on something that seems so basic. I don't care if chemistry was kind of a sham in this years mode or in years prior, as long as they just are upfront and say what it will be like in FIFA 17. Like how hard would it to be, "Hey in FIFA 17 you get 1 point boost for each chevron that your player gets, as shown on their card, and each chem lower than 5 you get one point docked off every stat respectively" and actually have it play out to that?

If you want the first time to learn about the FIFA 17 latest news. Our website u4fifa.com will be your best choice.