A political club took a biased decision in blocking promotion of a judge due to her abortion views. It is first time in history that Manhattan political club, which is quite influential took a majority vote of such type for a city civil court judge as they disagreed the way she handles issues of pregnancy termination. Against Jude Lori Sattler, the Jim Owles Liberal Democratic Club put down her promotion unanimously, which was about judicial delegates to fill the vacant Supreme Court judgeships for a convention this month.

Today, reproductive care and women access to it are nothing less than controversial. If a teen gets her pregnancy terminated, it is more like a taboo in few regions. There are many such limitations affecting females and their stand to a free choice of attaining pregnancy termination.

[b]How Are Abortion Issues Politicized?[/b]
It is not a surprise that politicians and lawmakers often take biased steps in proposing bills, decisions which are stark contrast to wellbeing of women and the city. The step shocked citizens, and the club is popular and was expected to make a practical call than defy its norms and hold grudge for the Judge. Today pregnancy termination topic is not only a common man’s debate, but escalated to political parties and other institutions. Many states pose restrictions over abortion pill access and clinics that offer pregnancy ending facilities are being closed down.

Pro-life campaign did take off since few years, but these have become quite aggressive. Many of these misinform women, and scare them away from ending pregnancy not considering if their decision is due to a health issue or otherwise. Banning pregnancy termination has been agenda of few people, organizations, political leader etc. A counterforce by pro-choice institutions is making efforts to keep off the limitations on reproductive care for females as much as possible. Yet the tug of war continues and sorrowfully, these become prime attention of legislations meant to exploit citizens.

[b]Judiciary Controversy Reflects Personal Bias[/b]
The club decision though unexpected, is another example how restrictive abortion care is. Not only are common people affected, but those voicing opinions against are executed or mishandled. The Judge had not taken any decision, which upset the law, but was still handed down because she had taken women’s stand. She understood the ordeal a female has to go through when seeking services to halt her pregnancy. The club is known to endorse jurists, but never held negative referendum since 2004, until now. Sattler had however slammed a mother for getting her pregnancy ended in a child-custody case.

For some, the decision club took could be inviting when this case of 2013 is considered, which was a vote against abortion rights. Sattler is one of the candidates that are running for the five openings. Her voting out by judicial politics was reckoned by Appellate Division. Many such events, where Judges and doctors doing pregnancy termination were targeted wrongly as it is based on pro-choice or pro-life thinking. But, decision for healthcare and law must be separated than remaining interlinked.