May 24, 2016 (abortionpillsrx.com): In San Francisco, there are three clinics that provide pregnancy termination. These are located in Potrero Hill, Haight, and Bernal Heights. There are more two facilities in Union Square and Outer Mission that encourage anti-abortion advices and message in guise of offering family planning help. Most of these institutes are pro-life, and even if the female wants to order abortion pill to save her from turmoil, the doctors will disallow the healthcare for them.

First Resort Pregnancy Center, re-branded to Third Box Pregnancy Clinics is a Bay Area chain that is known as Support Circle Clinics. It has challenged the San Francisco’s ordinance in their federal court. City Attorney (Dennis Herrera) went ahead to say that the First Resort’s advertising is like an insidious practice, which victimizes women, those themselves could be victims. It may be problematic as these centers interfere with female’s time-sensitive and constitutionally protected right for their reproductive choice. The law was upheld in 2015 by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong of the U.S, Oakland.

Pregnancy Care Facilities Lie to Females

These anti-pregnancy ending communities are called crisis pregnancy centers (CPCs); limited service pregnancy centers (LSPCs), pregnancy counseling centers, and pro-choice counseling centers. The anti-choice clinics market themselves as giving alternatives to pregnant women. The CPCs persuade women to carry pregnancy for full term even for those undergoing emotional and physical abuse. Their way to change peoples mind about abortion pill buy alternative is telling them about mythical health hazards and side effects, which work as scare tactics.
Support Circle Clinic has an office at the 450 Sutter Street, while 2 more are located in Redwood City and Oakland. First Resort’s – Support Circle’s predecessor of AB 775 files for challenge, the hospital believes that ending pregnancy harms the woman, her family, and her partner along with the unborn child. It is their mission to create a world free of pregnancy termination. This intention is buried in their website’s FAQs, yet they do not loudly express their religion based thought.

Incomplete Alternatives to Pregnancy Given

Some of these state that ending pregnancy increases risk to breast cancer or mental issues, which are not true. Their facilities include counseling against giving up the pregnancy. In reality these are faith-based institutions with narrowed counseling services relying on community resources, advising women against taking abortion pill, even in the case of danger to life or health. In the means to dissuade pregnant women from terminating fetus, they avoid serving women pregnancy termination for weeks together, so that they have to carry out the birth instead.
In 2015, the state to first demand CPCs to inform all public in their family planning procedure about pregnancy termination was California. Assembly Bill 775, the Reproductive FACT Act, states the reproductive rights advocates’ success in regulating the CPCs. But, NARAL discovered in their undercover investigations that CPCs at the most are not abiding the law. As the clinics are not enforcing the laws in real, it still endangers women’s health and their choice to terminate pregnancy.

Pro-Life Clinics Misinform Women Needing Abortion

The San Francisco Pregnancy Information Disclosure and Protection Ordinance, accepted in 2011, disable clinics from offering false and misleading advertising or to act as if these give services that they actually don’t. The law requires clinics to state whether they provide referrals or pregnancy termination services. Some who are not convinced may prefer taking online abortion pill, but they must have received the tablets or surgical assistance from clinics as well to avoid obtaining the medicines from elsewhere.

The state has more than 200 restrictions on pregnancy termination out past the six years. Clinics from conservative states are often subjected to hospitality from the health departments that delay permits. This has a negative impact on women who desperately need the pregnancy ending services, and such females are often boycotted, stigmatized, and abused mentally by pro-life groups or communities. Kansas and Oklahoma also are known for prohibiting public-funding of clinics that offer ending pregnancy facilities. This disallows medical professions of today’s generation to lean how to perform the procedure.